Shreyas Iyer, known for his proficiency against spin, has struggled in the ongoing series against England, facing challenges not just with spin but also in other aspects of his game.
Kevin Pietersen expressed frustration at Shreyas Iyer’s missed opportunity to score a century in the second Test against England. He highlighted the importance of seizing such chances, especially in the absence of key players like Virat Kohli, KL Rahul, and Ravindra Jadeja. Pietersen criticized Iyer’s dismissal as sloppy, emphasizing the need for batsmen to capitalize on their opportunities.
The return of key players like KL Rahul adds pressure on Shreyas Iyer to perform consistently. Despite his competition with Rajat Patidar for a spot in the team, Iyer’s aggressive batting style might give him an edge. However, the situation highlights the need for Iyer to capitalize on his opportunities and perform consistently.
Shreyas Iyer’s Test career suggests that he has a unique and unorthodox style of play. He may not exhibit traditional traits like composure or hunger as desired by some, including Kevin Pietersen. However, his unconventional approach to batting can be both intriguing and confusing for opponents and fans alike.
Shreyas Iyer’s batting approach in Visakhapatnam, where he shuffled outside leg before the ball was released and then returned to his original position to play the ball, drew criticism from Kevin Pietersen. Pietersen expressed his discomfort with Iyer’s unconventional movement, suggesting that it could lead to confusion about the positioning of his stumps and potentially affect his batting performance.
Kevin Pietersen might have been frustrated because Shreyas Iyer is known for his aggressive batting against spin, showcasing quick footwork, audacity, creativity, and skill. However, these traits haven’t translated into success for Iyer in this series. The shuffling movement observed in his batting technique is more common in limited-overs cricket played on subcontinent pitches, which might have added to Pietersen’s perplexity.
Shreyas Iyer’s batting approach resembles that of Pakistan’s Salim Malik against spinners, but while Malik would stay at the crease and play attacking shots through the off side, Iyer seems to initiate a bold move but doesn’t fully commit to it. In the second innings, when he did move towards the bowler as suggested by Pietersen, he attempted a big shot against the turn but mistimed it towards long-off.
Against James Anderson on a calm pitch, Shreyas Iyer initially attempted to pull the short-pitched deliveries. However, he abruptly shifted his approach to one he has employed previously, moving outside leg stump in an attempt to swat balls over the off side. Despite his efforts, he failed to connect with any of the deliveries and even came close to dragging one onto his stumps, leading to amusement from Ollie Pope and the fielding team.
Interestingly, Shreyas Iyer’s approach of moving outside leg stump to deal with short-pitched deliveries echoes the tactics used by Don Bradman during the infamous Bodyline series. Faced with a packed leg-side field and relentless bouncers from Harold Larwood and others, Bradman opted to move outside leg stump and attempt to slash the deliveries to the off side in search of runs. This approach, reminiscent of Bradman’s tactics, divided opinions in the cricketing world, with some viewing it as a sign of caution while others saw it as a practical way to counter the aggressive bowling strategy.
On a flat track at Visakhapatnam, Shreyas Iyer faced James Anderson, known more for his swing bowling than intense bouncers, yet Iyer’s approach remained unchanged. He prefers to bat aggressively, showing reluctance to sway or duck away from deliveries.
This approach poses challenges, especially against disciplined bowlers like Anderson, with the risk of getting caught near the boundary. However, Iyer has shown adaptability in his batting technique in the past, as observed by Mohammad Kaif during the World Cup, where he made adjustments to his bat-lift to ensure a tighter and smoother swing.
Despite acknowledging the importance of leaving or keeping the ball down, Shreyas Iyer seems reluctant to adopt these tactics. It’s unclear whether he fears encouraging more bouncers, prefers a more aggressive approach, or simply wants to maintain a certain image. However, his current approach isn’t deterring bowlers from targeting him with short deliveries. Ultimately, his success on the field will determine the effectiveness of his batting style. In the upcoming match in Rajkot, he’ll need to deliver a strong performance to silence critics and solidify his place in the team.
Read more Sports News
